91影视

Skip to main content
School of Engineering Homepage
Frugal Innovation Hub

Tuolumne River Interactive Map

Explore a River Health Assessment of the lower Tuolumne River watershed presented as an interactive map. You can select/unselect relevant layers for five watershed sections. The river health assessment was developed by a collaboration of the Water & Climate Justice Lab, two capstone teams at 91影视, and the Yosemite River Alliance (Modesto Office). The map includes analysis on the distribution and proximity of irrigated farmland, protected areas, riparian habitat, sources of pollution, and community infrastructure in five sections of the lower watershed, below San Pedro Dam.

Overview

The health of a river is inseparable from the well-being of the people and ecosystems that depend on it. Yet, rivers across the United States are under increasing pressure from human activity. Even with protections under the Clean Water Act,  many rivers continue to face pollution, reduced connectivity, and declining ecological function. These pressures affect the human and non-human (i.e. fish) communities in and along these rivers. The Tuolumne River, which runs through the Central Valley and Modesto regions, exemplifies this tension. In addition to its historical significance during the Gold Rush, the river continues to supply water for agriculture, sustain local ecosystems, and meet the daily needs of surrounding communities. Farmers rely on the water to irrigate crops that feed the region and beyond. Local residents depend on the river for drinking water, recreation, and connection to the natural environment. The river also supports habitats for fish, birds, and other wildlife, contributing to regional biodiversity. Wildlife and biodiversity directly influences the communities that rely on rivers for drinking water, farming, recreation, and cultural practices. These overlapping dependencies mean that changes in water quality, flow, or ecological health have cascading effects for both people and nature.

Understanding how land use, industrial activity, and climate change affect the Tuolumne, therefore, is essential. By examining the relationships between human activity and watershed health, this study provides insight into how local decisions shape water quality, ecosystem function, and community well-being. The goal is to identify patterns that can inform more sustainable land management practices and strengthen the resilience of the Modesto region and the Central Valley as a whole. Protecting the Tuolumne is not only about preserving a river; it is about safeguarding the communities, agriculture, and ecosystems that rely on it today and into the future.

The WCJL partnered with The Yosemite Rivers Alliance to conduct this work. The Yosemite Rivers Alliance works to protect and restore rivers in the Sierra Nevada and Central Valley through pollution reduction, habitat improvements, and supporting the long-term resilience of the rivers, making sure they stay healthy for both people and ecosystems. This project aligns with their mission by looking at the health of the Tuolumne River and how human activity and land use affect water quality and habitats. By analyzing these patterns, we can provide information that helps guide better land and water management. Working with the Yosemite Rivers Alliance ensured that findings supported local efforts to protect the river. 

What we found is that composite river health scores varied across the five sections of the Tuolumne River, reflecting differences in water quality, land management, ecosystem condition, and water flow. Section 1 had the highest composite score (3.610), while Section 3 had the lowest (2.158), showing that river health is unevenly distributed along the watershed. Water Quality was the primary driver of variation, largely influenced by nitrates and surrounding land use. Sections with high percentages of irrigated farmland, such as Section 3, scored lower on Water Quality metrics, while Sections with less intensive agriculture or low industrial activity, like Section 1, maintained higher scores overall despite some nitrate concerns.